I had wandered off the subject of proving a negative and was discoursing on the advisability of requiring that the more extraordinary of two conflicting claims should carry the burden of proof.
Which I think is reasonable, but which doesn't address the question of proving a negative.
no subject
I had wandered off the subject of proving a negative and was discoursing on the advisability of requiring that the more extraordinary of two conflicting claims should carry the burden of proof.
Which I think is reasonable, but which doesn't address the question of proving a negative.