ext_31590 ([identity profile] catsittingstill.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] catsittingstill 2009-05-05 01:56 am (UTC)

Thomas, Scalia and Alito slipped through the cracks, yes, and I have my doubts about Roberts.

True that female does not equal decisions I would agree with. Palin pops to mind. But majority female would at least equal a Supreme Court that doesn't stand around talking about giving each other wedgies. A modicum of professional behavior while on duty does not strike me as too much to ask.

If you agree that a special effort should be made to find a qualified woman to take Souter's place, why not agree that a special effort should be made to find a qualified woman to take every place that becomes available until we have five women on the court? I don't understand why it would be an okay strategy for one position but not for five.

I do not have anyone particular in mind, but from what I last read in the paper there are at least six leading women candidates, so there doesn't seem to be any shortage.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting