I expect there are going to be serious confounding factors, though, in terms of how stable the woman's life was beforehand.

Unplanned pregnancy is generally linked to high-risk behaviour; I'd really like to see how "aftermath" studies of abortion and adoption choosing women account for the fact that it's the women they would measure as at-risk for mental health issues beforehand who are getting into a situation where they need to make that choice.

I'm a bit troubled by the magic in the author's assumptions that a bundle of cells is nothing, but at birth it's giving up a real child. It doesn't seem much more based in sense than any other arbitrary marker of, "Now it's real." A small seedling is a real tree, even if it doesn't give shade yet, and my understanding is that for several months post-natal fetuses aren't big on reciprocity, either.

Of course, my perspective is that of a woman who wants a child very much and isn't at all sure it will be possible. This biases me in favour of the "what a waste of potential!" view towards discarding a healthily developing fetus.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

catsittingstill: (Default)
catsittingstill

February 2024

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 16th, 2025 06:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios