Bizarre

Jun. 15th, 2013 05:39 pm
catsittingstill: (Default)
 So I got this message today.  Since the person who sent it has his journal set up so I can't reply to the message, I will copy the message here, and put my reply below.

--- talvinamarich wrote:
> If a woman banned a man from her LJ, and he continued to try to contact her and directed others to her journal, I truly believe you would be leading the charge against him.
> Yet, you think that you can continue to harass me. Which just shows that your claimed philosophy is a self-serving lie.  
> You grossly misrepresented the incident that led to your banning to stir up sympathy for yourself because OMG, somebody unfriended you in Social Media.   Get over it already.
>
>Take me off your "friends"-list and get on with your life, and stay the hell out of mine. 

My reply:

?  I couldn't comment on your post on your journal to express my support, so I commented on mine.  To express my support.  I did not bring up our history because I did not want to prejudice people against what you had to say, which was legit, despite how you had previously behaved, which was not.
 
I kept reading those parts of your journal you chose to make public because despite your irrationality on the subject of feminism--you could have saved yourself a lot of angst over the years if you googled that phrase you flung at me by the way; since I get zero hits, it is obviously not a part of mainstream feminist thought--you sometimes have interesting things to say on other subjects.
 
But you have indeed found the key to being unfriended.  Getting mad at me was something I could overlook; getting mad at my kind and unsuspecting friend who was only trying to offer you her support has crossed the line.  I feel partially responsible because in my desire to be fair to you, I didn't warn *her.*  That won't be happening again.
 
I categorically reject the contention I have misrepresented anything about you.  "Being a feminist" is my honest understanding of what you think is wrong with me.  I'm not going to stop and I'm not going to change.  All my other friends like me this way.  Get over it.
 
I grant your wish.
 
Cat Sittingstill
 
Which reminds me, I probably shouldn't have to say this to anyone reading this, but just in case--this guy plainly wants to be left alone and I encourage you to honor his wish. It seems unlikely he will become more rational on this subject for being pestered about it.
catsittingstill: (Default)
So, I was never a dog person.  I knew I didn't understand dogs (and didn't particularly like most dogs though some individual dogs were quite nice.)  So I didn't mess with dogs.  Then I took up with my husband who really is a dog person, and learned that there are ways to see what a dog is feeling beyond tail wagging / not wagging and ways to approach dogs that make them generally more comfortable, and got better at interacting with dogs.

Now even at my most clueless I knew some of this stuff and knew I didn't know some of this stuff, and made the sensible choice not to approach dogs when I didn't know how, but--as a general primer on interacting with dogs let me say a few things.

If you want to pet a dog you don't just walk up and grab.  There are stages to this approach and the dog gets a veto over it.  Or at least it does if you don't want to get bitten. 

You start by slowly approaching the dog, without staring at it, because that's hostile.  You stop several feet away and wait to see if the dog approaches you.  If the dog backs away, you stop approaching.  You're probably done here unless the dog changes its mind in the next few minutes.  Sitting down on the ground makes you look harmless and may help the dog change its mind.  Do not approach the dog while the dog is backing away.  For goodness sake do not corner the dog.  Remember, you loom over even the largest dog, which makes you potentially scary.

If the dog approaches you, you extend a hand.  If the dog shies away you are probably done here unless the dog changes its mind in the next few minutes.  Do not move toward the dog--that is threatening.  Hold still, and perhaps make encouraging noises, or withdraw the hand and look away but hold still. 

If the dog comes up and sniffs your hand or your ankles, slowly reach toward somewhere the dog considers impersonal.  Between the shoulderblades is a good one on a dog.  Just behind the head is good.  Don't start out by reaching for something personal like the belly--that is threatening.  Don't grab.  Let the dog see what you are doing; don't surprise it.  If it shies out from under your hand you are done here.  It doesn't want to be petted; accept the attention it will give and don't ask for more.

So, let's review.  Respecting a dog so you won't get hurt. 
  • Don't approach if it is moving away from you. 
  • Don't corner it. 
  • Don't surprise it.
  • Don't reach toward it if it is shying away. 
  • Don't continue to pet it if it tries to stop you.
The offending guy at ReaderCon?  Not only didn't manage to give his victim the respect you give another human being; he didn't even manage to give her the respect you give a stray dog.

And this is why some people are angry.  Because this kind of lack of very basic respect is pretty common--and asking for the same respect a stray dog gets really isn't asking for very much.

catsittingstill: (Default)
There has been a fair amount of comment on a video called "Science--it's a girl thing" that was intended to encourage teen girls to stay interested in science.  Unfortunately it went about this, I am told, by having beautiful young women dressed to attract sexual interest dancing in lab-like backgrounds under the approving gaze of an older man in a lab coat.

My thoughts on this are that the best way to keep teen girls from dropping out of science might be to show diverse women doing interesting science.  Because let's face it---the girls you want to attract to science are the girls who like *science*--if they're in it for the lipstick, they're not going to stick with it.  It's okay to have *one* of the women shown be a Hot Chick, because that's part of diversity, as long as 1) she's there for the science, not the men, and 2) she doesn't get special rewards onscreen, like extra male attention or extra status, or extra airtime.  But you really need enough diversity that a fat girl or a girl of color or a disabled girl can all say to themselves "people like me can do that--it's not just for" fill-in-the-blank.  Because when they're saying it, you can bet the straight white girls have got the message too.

And yeah, you need a fair amount of airtime to deal with all these things.  But folks--it's not just one commercial that should be handling it.  It's everything.  The Bechdel movie measure is still relevant, and it shouldn't be.  And while it's specifically about women, the problem it points up--that some sets of people are presented for our attention way out of proportion to their numbers, while others are effectively shrouded away from sight and relegated at best to specific limited roles--applies to way more than just women.

So anyway--I realize I'm Jenny-behind-the-fair on this, but now that my life is not all-album all the time I thought I'd mention it.

Profile

catsittingstill: (Default)
catsittingstill

February 2024

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 12:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios