Hugo Reading 6 Campbells
Jul. 23rd, 2014 09:20 amThis is kind of a contradiction in terms, since the Campbell award is not a Hugo. But it's given at the same time, the same group of people can nominate and vote, and the Campbell material goes out in the Hugo packet on the same terms (which is to say maybe it does, and maybe it doesn't--something to remember abou the Hugo packet!)
The nominees (and the books/stories provided for each, in no particular order) are:
Ramez Naam, _Nexus_
Wesley Chu, _The Lives Of Tao_
Sophia Samatar, _Stranger in Oolondria_
Max Gladstone _Two Serpents Rise_ and Three Parts Dead_ (novels)
and
Benjanun Sriduangkaew _The Bees Her Heart The Hive Her Belly_ _Fade To Gold_ and _Silent Bridge, Pale Cascade_ (short stories)
5) _The Lives Of Tao_ I started with a good will, but set aside impatiently when it seemed to me that the protagonist was spontaneously becoming stupid whenever the plot called for it. It had potential otherwise, and it wouldn't be a travesty if it won, but I'll be checking future releases by this author out at the library rather than the bookstore.
4) _Stranger in Oolondria_ I realize I'm in the minority on this, but I strongly disliked this book, mostly because I thought Jissavet was a complete jerk, and I resented that nobody else in the book seemed to be able to see it. I mean, I'm perfectly okay with turning your back and walking away from blood kin who mistreat you, and I understand how it is to feel impatient with someone whose thoughts are slow and plodding, but I do feel like when someone has shown you nothing but kindness and made considerable sacrifices for you, to treat them like dirt in return (the jewelry scene pops to mind) and never notice or care, is unacceptable. But I haven't seen any other reader mention this, so maybe this book will work for other people. And there is no denying that the writing is beautiful.
3) Sriduankaew's stories. These were okay, but I kind of had trouble following what was going on. My Hugo reading has necessarily been somewhat rushed, and I suspect some of the more poetic and evocative writing is at a disadvantage as a result.
1) (formerly 2)) Max Gladstone's books. _Two Serpents Rise_ was okay--_Three Parts Dead_ I thought was really good. I loved the idea of law as a form of magic. I may yet change my mind and put Max first.
2) (formerly 1)) _Nexus_. You know, in some ways, this is popcorn. There are parts of this--like why doesn't the protagonist have a better appreciation of the potential for abuse, and where is the funding for all this coming from--that just don't make sense. But I loved the ideas behind it and the soaring optimism, and I really enjoyed the idea of how the monks dealt with it (I can't really tell you what they did without spoiling it, but I really liked it and it seemed plausible to me at the time.) But now that I think about it, I am going to swap Max and Ramez. Because, really, this is popcorn, and _Three Parts Dead_ I think is better done.
So I guess it's a good thing that I wrote this.
The nominees (and the books/stories provided for each, in no particular order) are:
Ramez Naam, _Nexus_
Wesley Chu, _The Lives Of Tao_
Sophia Samatar, _Stranger in Oolondria_
Max Gladstone _Two Serpents Rise_ and Three Parts Dead_ (novels)
and
Benjanun Sriduangkaew _The Bees Her Heart The Hive Her Belly_ _Fade To Gold_ and _Silent Bridge, Pale Cascade_ (short stories)
5) _The Lives Of Tao_ I started with a good will, but set aside impatiently when it seemed to me that the protagonist was spontaneously becoming stupid whenever the plot called for it. It had potential otherwise, and it wouldn't be a travesty if it won, but I'll be checking future releases by this author out at the library rather than the bookstore.
4) _Stranger in Oolondria_ I realize I'm in the minority on this, but I strongly disliked this book, mostly because I thought Jissavet was a complete jerk, and I resented that nobody else in the book seemed to be able to see it. I mean, I'm perfectly okay with turning your back and walking away from blood kin who mistreat you, and I understand how it is to feel impatient with someone whose thoughts are slow and plodding, but I do feel like when someone has shown you nothing but kindness and made considerable sacrifices for you, to treat them like dirt in return (the jewelry scene pops to mind) and never notice or care, is unacceptable. But I haven't seen any other reader mention this, so maybe this book will work for other people. And there is no denying that the writing is beautiful.
3) Sriduankaew's stories. These were okay, but I kind of had trouble following what was going on. My Hugo reading has necessarily been somewhat rushed, and I suspect some of the more poetic and evocative writing is at a disadvantage as a result.
1) (formerly 2)) Max Gladstone's books. _Two Serpents Rise_ was okay--_Three Parts Dead_ I thought was really good. I loved the idea of law as a form of magic. I may yet change my mind and put Max first.
2) (formerly 1)) _Nexus_. You know, in some ways, this is popcorn. There are parts of this--like why doesn't the protagonist have a better appreciation of the potential for abuse, and where is the funding for all this coming from--that just don't make sense. But I loved the ideas behind it and the soaring optimism, and I really enjoyed the idea of how the monks dealt with it (I can't really tell you what they did without spoiling it, but I really liked it and it seemed plausible to me at the time.) But now that I think about it, I am going to swap Max and Ramez. Because, really, this is popcorn, and _Three Parts Dead_ I think is better done.
So I guess it's a good thing that I wrote this.