The impression was given in that you chose to link to his post, which was not about being "mad at skeptics[1]" but about being annoyed with media portrayal of 'believers', especially those who are confused with SF fans and told to "get a life" (I have one, thanks, and I don't play anyone on TV). If you had linked to one of his earlier posts where he was indeed getting annoyed with sceptics in general, it may have been a valid point (although it would still look as though you were equating him with people who burn non-believers). Or, indeed, if you hadn't linked at all to a specific person (there are plenty of examples of people who dispute with sceptics after all).
[1] Aside: is the version with 'k' a US variant? I think I always write it with 'c' and it looks odd with 'k'; definitions I've seen don't have any indication.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: The tracks of my reactions
Date: 2011-01-26 07:49 pm (UTC)[1] Aside: is the version with 'k' a US variant? I think I always write it with 'c' and it looks odd with 'k'; definitions I've seen don't have any indication.