Apr. 1st, 2008

catsittingstill: (Default)
I was poking around the Web this morning and came across an amusing post (presumably inspired by April Fool's Day): Top 10 Creationist Discoveries of All Time.

And this kind of got my thoughts running along these lines, inspired by, but not really a response to the post in question:

1) obviously we don't make fun of disabled people; that's just a) wrong and b) deeply uncool. 

2)So we don't make fun of mentally disabled people either.  Wrong and uncool; we're all on the same page here, I'm pretty sure.

3) This would logically mean that we shouldn't make fun of stupid people--but sometimes I do.  Or at least, I make fun of people who I call stupid because they have nutbar ideas that they insist on spreading.

4) But having nutbar ideas doesn't necessarily mean someone is stupid (can't learn--arguably a genuine disability that one shouldn't make fun of).  It may just mean that someone is ignorant (doesn't know better, but could learn better under the right circumstances.)

5) But sometimes ignorance isn't the ignorant person's fault.  Perhaps the ignorant person has never had the opportunity to learn.  Perhaps the ignorant person was even deliberately taught the nutbar ideas as a gullible child and carefully innoculated against any appeals to rationality and logic and evidence that might have made it possible for the ignorant person to learn.

If the ignorant person's ignorance was deliberately created and maintained by others, is the ignorant person the innocent victim of a disability?  Is making fun of the ignorant person wrong and cruel, the way making fun of somebody in a wheelchair is wrong and cruel?

I'm having a hard time deciding.

Profile

catsittingstill: (Default)
catsittingstill

February 2024

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 16th, 2025 10:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios