Baby's First-And-A-Half Portrait
Feb. 13th, 2011 05:40 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I had Binturong all drawn out, and then I was reading a kayak book last night and it mentioned that the center of lateral area (the underwater cross sectional area of the boat seen from the side) should be behind the paddler (thus, behind the center of buoyancy).
When I fired up Bearboat and checked Binturong--oops, it wasn't. I thought the kayak book had a good, plausible argument for why this should be so, so I tweaked the Binturong design some more to move the CLA behind the center of buoyancy.
Meaning, of course, the station drawings I had just spent six hours producing from offsets were, ah, out of date. Well, better six hours wasted than six months if I actually build the design and then don't like it. New offsets, and off to Carson-Newman to say "I know I said I was done using the table but..." (except not really, they let me just come in and use it; I don't have to ask every time.)
New portrait half-finished. I'm getting better with practice. Go me.
When I fired up Bearboat and checked Binturong--oops, it wasn't. I thought the kayak book had a good, plausible argument for why this should be so, so I tweaked the Binturong design some more to move the CLA behind the center of buoyancy.
Meaning, of course, the station drawings I had just spent six hours producing from offsets were, ah, out of date. Well, better six hours wasted than six months if I actually build the design and then don't like it. New offsets, and off to Carson-Newman to say "I know I said I was done using the table but..." (except not really, they let me just come in and use it; I don't have to ask every time.)
New portrait half-finished. I'm getting better with practice. Go me.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-13 10:52 pm (UTC)All this is related to Bob's and my patent, by the way.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 12:25 am (UTC)Its true that another way to get the effect is ti have rounded contours ahead and v-shaped contours behind, but the program I'm using doesn't have any way to achieve that that I can find. Well, it kind of does--I could move more of the carrying capacity forward, and if I held the draft steady that would tend to bulge out the parts of the forward stations that are under the water, but I want the center of buoyancy aft of the center of the boat because that's supposed to be faster.
Anyway, I ended up putting more rocker in the front, which had a similar effect except now I have about an inch and a half of rocker, which is more than I intended, but which was what it took to shift the CLA.
And I only have the CLA 2 inches behind the center of buoyancy and I wonder if that is enough.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 12:55 pm (UTC)I'm guessing the two inch difference would be at the maneuverable end of things and half the width of the boat or more would bring you into the straight forward range.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 01:18 pm (UTC)At the time I had no idea how far back it should go. "Behind" was all I knew. After much thrashing around with search engines and bulletin boards I finally found someone who said "1/2 inch to 2 inches" was a normal range.
So I'm wondering whether 2 inches was too much. It falls in the normal range but I'm not sure I trust the extremes. I want a boat that is more weighted to the tracking than the turning. On the other hand, it's not just rocker and CLA vs CB that matters--it's also the shape of the hull and this one is definitely shallow V, which tracks better than shallow arch and much better than flat. So maybe it's all cool.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-15 03:02 am (UTC)I agree that boat 1, boat 2 and the Grumman leaves a little something to be desired in the name department. You could always name them now, I suppose. Unless you don't have them anymore (well, I guess you could still do it, but that would seem a little flat to me.)
Binturong is the design name; I will probably call the next canoe "Moxie" unless I think of something better. Although "Happy Place" would be a good name for a canoe. "Audacity" is arguably more of a kayak name. Or a whitewater canoe, but I don't see myself ever wanting one of those. Which is a pity because Audacity would be a great name.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 12:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-15 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-15 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-16 12:18 pm (UTC)