(no subject)
Mar. 8th, 2007 02:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I found this article in the Washington Post by way of an interesting blog called Feministe
The short version is that there is a website I won't link to that, among other things, trashes female law students by publishing their pictures, their names, and various unwelcome sexual speculations about them by a bunch of wannabe-stalkers who are apparently (appallingly) also law students. This website is apparently popular enough that when prospective employers Google the names of women they're thinking of hiring, this objectionable material comes up high in the ranking. It is suspected that this is why women whose personal information has been posted on this site are having a hard time finding jobs. And the money quote from the site owner, who categorically refuses to do anything about it?
Translation: it's perfectly okay to damage the careers of innocent women whose personal information was dragged onto the site without their consent. It would be wrong to allow the careers of the trash-talking wannabe stalkers to be damaged by their own despicable actions.
I was talking about it with my friend Donald Clarke, and he had an idea. So here's my major question.
Is it worthwhile trying to Googlebomb the names of these women attached to some sort of page (perhaps the Washington Post article, or the Feministe post?) explaining what is going on? So that when potential employers search on the women's names, the first thing they find is a page explaining that these women did not willingly join this "beauty contest" and are the innocent victims of this trash sex-talk? We might have to get a lot of links to do it; the site in question is pretty popular.
The short version is that there is a website I won't link to that, among other things, trashes female law students by publishing their pictures, their names, and various unwelcome sexual speculations about them by a bunch of wannabe-stalkers who are apparently (appallingly) also law students. This website is apparently popular enough that when prospective employers Google the names of women they're thinking of hiring, this objectionable material comes up high in the ranking. It is suspected that this is why women whose personal information has been posted on this site are having a hard time finding jobs. And the money quote from the site owner, who categorically refuses to do anything about it?
Asked why posters could not use their real names, he said, "People would not have as much fun, frankly, if they had to worry about employers pulling up information on them."
Translation: it's perfectly okay to damage the careers of innocent women whose personal information was dragged onto the site without their consent. It would be wrong to allow the careers of the trash-talking wannabe stalkers to be damaged by their own despicable actions.
I was talking about it with my friend Donald Clarke, and he had an idea. So here's my major question.
Is it worthwhile trying to Googlebomb the names of these women attached to some sort of page (perhaps the Washington Post article, or the Feministe post?) explaining what is going on? So that when potential employers search on the women's names, the first thing they find is a page explaining that these women did not willingly join this "beauty contest" and are the innocent victims of this trash sex-talk? We might have to get a lot of links to do it; the site in question is pretty popular.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-08 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 02:42 pm (UTC)Can't pursue it until after the weekend, alas.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-20 05:57 pm (UTC)