(no subject)
Sep. 8th, 2008 10:55 amTony Auth has a great cartoon on the Republican VP.
I found it at Pharyngula.
There's also an interesting letter about her running around on the internet.
NPR also did a couple of stories on her career in Alaska, but I don't have them handy.
I don't think people should diss her because she's a working mom. I *do* think they should diss her support of bad policies like abstinence-only sex ed and banning abortion. I *do* think they should diss her support for teaching creationism and her assertion that global warming is a hoax. I *do* think they should diss her for abuse of power issues like trying to ban books (and then to fire the librarian who stood up to her) and trying to get her ex-brother-in-law fired (and *really* firing Alaska's top cop for standing up to her.)
And I *do* think they should diss her for her hypocrisy in claiming she told the federal goverment "thanks but no thanks" on the "bridge to nowhere" when what she actually did was *take* the money but not build the bridge. That's not reforming anything.
Just sayin'.
I found it at Pharyngula.
There's also an interesting letter about her running around on the internet.
NPR also did a couple of stories on her career in Alaska, but I don't have them handy.
I don't think people should diss her because she's a working mom. I *do* think they should diss her support of bad policies like abstinence-only sex ed and banning abortion. I *do* think they should diss her support for teaching creationism and her assertion that global warming is a hoax. I *do* think they should diss her for abuse of power issues like trying to ban books (and then to fire the librarian who stood up to her) and trying to get her ex-brother-in-law fired (and *really* firing Alaska's top cop for standing up to her.)
And I *do* think they should diss her for her hypocrisy in claiming she told the federal goverment "thanks but no thanks" on the "bridge to nowhere" when what she actually did was *take* the money but not build the bridge. That's not reforming anything.
Just sayin'.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 03:51 pm (UTC)However, the email that lists "books Sarah Palin wants to ban", allegedly from the minutes of a Wasilla Public Library meeting, is a hoax. It's true that Palin asked the librarian whether the librarian would cooperate with book banning (http://www.adn.com/sarah-palin/story/515512.html), got an emphatic NO, and a few months later fired the librarian for "not fully supporting" Palin. But there are no reports, much less records, of Palin targeting specific books.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 04:24 pm (UTC)It is also true that there is no record of what books Palin wanted to ban. The e-mail listing specific books is a hoax. It is a matter of public record that Palin asked the librarian how to ban books, got a frosty answer, and let the matter drop for a while.
Regarding the difference someone else noted in a comment to this entry (which I don't see on LJ at the moment for some reason) that Palin asked for the librarian's resignation rather than firing her--that's technically true but I see zero practical difference.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 06:39 pm (UTC)When she tries to pretend she's a reformer who has always opposed pork and earmarks, when she's been walloing in the stuff all her political life, that's another kettle of fish, and there ought to be sanctions for it.
In fairness, it seems that every OTHER politician in Alaska, both parties, has also made lifetime political careers out of sucking money out of the lower 48 for Alaska and spending to a degree that would make LBJ blush. They have no need for a state income or sales tax up there, and the Alaskan nickname for the rest of the country is "The Tit". And apparently they also spend a lot of time talking about what wusses the rest of us are, and they are right because we keep on feeding them tax money and getting kicked for our trouble.
How they figured they could get away with dressing up an Alaska politician as a "fiscal conservative" is beyond me.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 06:42 pm (UTC)What are we going to do if she becomes President?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 07:34 pm (UTC)She gets the vapors and declares herself too delicate to take any tough questions until they agree to treat her like a Tender Sweet Young Thing, and that's supposed to embody feminism? I don't see it.
Radical Right Christianity, sure.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 07:41 pm (UTC)She embodies--literally--the issue of feminism in the campaign, even though she opposes many ideas now accounted feminist. In like manner, Obama embodies an idea of racial tolerance, though he's no firebrand. Words like "vapors" and "delicate" come off as sexist, and Palin's supporters are going to use them against us. Let's not give them ammo. As far as I can tell Palin is a tough, charming fanatic, very good at divide and conquer, and I hope her opponents carefully consider their responses. I've already written a bunch about her and a reasonable progressive response; I can see I'm going to be writing more. Bleh.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-09 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-09 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-09 04:53 pm (UTC)Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 07:03 pm (UTC)And I thought, McCain keeps saying he'll work with the Democrats, and he won't put up with partisan sniping. And he picks her?
Now I read that she got a town of approximately 5,000 people with new debt of over $22,000,000...what on earth would she do to our national budget? And she did to create a sports complex, in a town without a sewage treatment plant? And she claims to be anti-pork? And a "fiscal conservative"?
Sigh.
And we haven't managed to push through the election reforms that the last two presidential elections showed were (and still are) needed to ensure a fair and accurate count of the votes can happen. (Didn't the people proposing paperless electronic balloting read The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 07:36 pm (UTC)Short article on Palin by Canadian investigative journalist Charlie James.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-09 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-09 02:00 am (UTC)During her tenure as mayor, the City of Wasilla tried to buy land from the Nature Conservancy for a hockey rink. When the city failed to sign the papers, the Conservancy sold it to someone else. Wasilla sued.
Initially, Wasilla won. The other buyer appealed, and eventually the judge reversed himself.
Unfortunately, by then, Wasilla had started building. Total avoidable cost: approximately $1.3 million.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122065537792905483.html
Corruption!
Date: 2008-09-09 01:11 pm (UTC)What's the difference between Palin and Muslim fundamentalists?
Date: 2008-09-09 04:59 pm (UTC)Re: Corruption!
Date: 2008-09-09 06:07 pm (UTC)My response:
Cry me a river of Whitewater.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-10 05:32 am (UTC)Is anyone having the horrifying feeling that McCain/Palin may win?