Quick Thoughts on Last Night's Debate
Oct. 3rd, 2008 09:31 am1) When Obama says he agrees with an opponent, I hear strong, competent adult being honest and reaching for consensus. When Palin says she agrees with an opponent, the skin between my shoulder blades crawls and I want to glance behind me, looking for the knife. Maybe that's because it seemed like every time she said she agreed with Biden, it was some kind of gotcha attack on Obama, except the one time it was a way to get out of answering the question about whether she supported civil rights for gay couples.
2) I understand that Palin was going to get some things wrong. She's been cramming like crazy for this, and it looks like it worked, mostly, and she just didn't have time to check out anything for herself, but had to accept what her handlers told her. But when she says Barak Obama voted against funding for the troops, and Biden points out that that bill was funding with a timeline, and that John McCain voted the exact same way on it, I expect her to be able to learn from experience on the fly.
When she repeated the slander later in the debate and had to be corrected again, it suggested that, like George W. Bush, she is incapable of revising her opinions based on new information. That's very disturbing. We've had eight years of a president like that and he has been pretty much an unmitigated disaster (or a series of them) for pretty much exactly that reason.
Unless, of course, she knows perfectly well it's false and is just repeating the lie hoping that enough repetitions will make people think it is true. It's a sad situation when "she is deliberately lying, repeatedly, in the hope that the electorate is too dumb to notice or too morally dead to care" is the more hopeful option.
3) Palin managed to be coherent, which is not entirely a surprise; that extra week of cramming seems to have done the trick, and she did okay at debates in Alaska. Biden managed to stay within his times, avoid any major foot-in-mouth episodes, and correct most of Palin's mis-statements without being either mean or condescending. He had the harder task, but I think he accomplished it.
Generally, I don't think it was a game changer.
2) I understand that Palin was going to get some things wrong. She's been cramming like crazy for this, and it looks like it worked, mostly, and she just didn't have time to check out anything for herself, but had to accept what her handlers told her. But when she says Barak Obama voted against funding for the troops, and Biden points out that that bill was funding with a timeline, and that John McCain voted the exact same way on it, I expect her to be able to learn from experience on the fly.
When she repeated the slander later in the debate and had to be corrected again, it suggested that, like George W. Bush, she is incapable of revising her opinions based on new information. That's very disturbing. We've had eight years of a president like that and he has been pretty much an unmitigated disaster (or a series of them) for pretty much exactly that reason.
Unless, of course, she knows perfectly well it's false and is just repeating the lie hoping that enough repetitions will make people think it is true. It's a sad situation when "she is deliberately lying, repeatedly, in the hope that the electorate is too dumb to notice or too morally dead to care" is the more hopeful option.
3) Palin managed to be coherent, which is not entirely a surprise; that extra week of cramming seems to have done the trick, and she did okay at debates in Alaska. Biden managed to stay within his times, avoid any major foot-in-mouth episodes, and correct most of Palin's mis-statements without being either mean or condescending. He had the harder task, but I think he accomplished it.
Generally, I don't think it was a game changer.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 06:42 pm (UTC)It usually ends up looking like a position of strength when one can stay calm under assault by a mob :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 02:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 06:40 pm (UTC)At any rate, FWIW, I'm glad you had fun and hope you found it informative.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 05:43 pm (UTC)As for it being a game changer: it wasn't expected to change any minds that were already made up, and I doubt that it did. Hopefully, people who haven't already firmly decided will be looking at substance rather than fluff. The deeper you look, the more completely Biden kicked her ass -- but she did far better than the infamous network interviews where the superficial first impression was of a complete idiot. But Biden also managed to avoid making himself look like a total dork.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 06:39 pm (UTC)But I happen to know that one of my neighbors didn't look that closely. Or thinks Biden did no better. Of course, he says he liked her before the debate, so I guess that may have played a role.
And it's just one guy, not a case of so goes the nation. I hope.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 10:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-05 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-04 02:33 pm (UTC)[updated to correct a copy error and include a better polling link]
no subject
Date: 2008-10-05 08:28 pm (UTC)Her smile looks fake to me, but it looks like the "I don't feel like smiling; I'm just doing it because you're supposed to smile for the camera" smile that everybody does at one time or another.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-06 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-05 12:16 am (UTC)Initially, Palin had very high marks from both men and women, her vague, patriotic generalities sparking positive responses. Initially, Biden had mild negative responses. As the questions became more specific, her numbers never got much above neutral, while Biden's soared. Significantly in my mind, at least, was that her numbers never went negative. Deer in headlights appeared to work for her ("Do something really cute.")
Yet, whenever she tried the "I'm just an average American," line, the positive lines nosedived towards neutral. The undecideds weren't buying it.
Hope, hope, hope, hope, hoping folks vote on issues....
(I have to admit, on a completely fru-fru level, I liked Palin's suit. It's kind of nice to see *fashion* in politics other than the sexless, "boxy" pantsuits and women's suits more often seen. A little Jackie Kennedyesque. Not that taste in suits has anything to do with suitability for office, but it was shiny.)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-05 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-05 04:47 pm (UTC)But I have access to a DVD of it, so I intend to watch at least part of it.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-05 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-05 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-05 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 08:05 am (UTC)Are you kidding? That's these people's entire M.O. That's what they do all the damn time. That's precisely what they've been doing for YEARS.
What disgusts me most is how many people it works on.