Associations
Oct. 10th, 2008 02:47 pmIn view of the McCain campaign's desperate attempts to change the subject from the economy and foreign policy by dragging out Barak Obama's past association with Bill Ayers (they served on a board of directors of a charity foundation together, and Ayers once hosted a party for Obama, when Obama was first running for the state senate of Illinois), I've been thinking about my own associations.
As it happens, I am presently serving on two boards of directors myself. And I have just realized that I don't know the first thing about the backgrounds of the people I serve with. I haven't hired a private detective to check them out (nor will I; it would be incredibly rude, and besides what normal person can afford that kind of thing?).
Take Mossy Creek Network. There's S, sweetly granola, simultaneously outgoing and shy, with roots that go back for generations in this area; J, proud owner and restorer of a historical farm; C, who has installed a windmill on his property to generate electricity. I admire these people for what they are now, but I couldn't tell you they were never members of the Weather Underground (except C, who is probably my age or younger, and was therefore either a child (like Obama, come to think of it) or not born yet at the time.)
Take the League of Women Voters. There's A, on the city council of the local city, J (different J), who organized our recent Candidates' Forum (and our upcoming one too), B, who means well but tends to be overcommitted. I can't prove that any of these people were never socialists, or communists. It seems unlikely, given the local political climate, but I haven't investigated them, and I'm not going to.
And John McCain can go soak his head.
While he's holding his face in the nice, cool water, he might ask himself if he's entirely comfortable with the hatred he's whipping up against members of the media and people of color. He might ask himself if the crowds shouting "Kill him" and "He's a terrorist!" and "Sit down, 'boy'!" are really showing the Republican Party to best advantage. He might ask himself what kind of legacy he wants to be associated with.
Just sayin'.
As it happens, I am presently serving on two boards of directors myself. And I have just realized that I don't know the first thing about the backgrounds of the people I serve with. I haven't hired a private detective to check them out (nor will I; it would be incredibly rude, and besides what normal person can afford that kind of thing?).
Take Mossy Creek Network. There's S, sweetly granola, simultaneously outgoing and shy, with roots that go back for generations in this area; J, proud owner and restorer of a historical farm; C, who has installed a windmill on his property to generate electricity. I admire these people for what they are now, but I couldn't tell you they were never members of the Weather Underground (except C, who is probably my age or younger, and was therefore either a child (like Obama, come to think of it) or not born yet at the time.)
Take the League of Women Voters. There's A, on the city council of the local city, J (different J), who organized our recent Candidates' Forum (and our upcoming one too), B, who means well but tends to be overcommitted. I can't prove that any of these people were never socialists, or communists. It seems unlikely, given the local political climate, but I haven't investigated them, and I'm not going to.
And John McCain can go soak his head.
While he's holding his face in the nice, cool water, he might ask himself if he's entirely comfortable with the hatred he's whipping up against members of the media and people of color. He might ask himself if the crowds shouting "Kill him" and "He's a terrorist!" and "Sit down, 'boy'!" are really showing the Republican Party to best advantage. He might ask himself what kind of legacy he wants to be associated with.
Just sayin'.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 07:41 pm (UTC)Same difference. For people of my generation (I was an activist in college while Ayres was blowing things up) it doesn't take a private investigator to know he would have spent life in prison for murder except for the case being thrown out because of illegal wiretapping.
I also serve on some charitable and non-profit boards, and also would never hire a PI to check out the individuals I serve with. But I do perform a web search whenever a new person joins, just on the theory that I ought to know a little bit about the people I'm serving with, and I mean that in a positive way.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 08:22 pm (UTC)I just had a quick look at the year I was eight from Wikipedia. The only things in there that even ring a bell are Nixon going to China, Watergate, and the E.R.A. And I suspect I remember them all because they got mentioned a lot for a while.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 09:09 pm (UTC)Ayres was almost twenty-five when he founded the Weather Underground. Now, I don't know what you were like when you were twenty-five. You might have been exactly like you are now, minus the physical mileage. But when I look back at the me of twelve years ago, when I was twenty-five, I know I had a few lessons to learn. Actually, no - the person I am right now has a few lessons to learn. The me of twelve years ago had a lot of lessons to learn.
It's been almost thirty years since Bill Ayres came out of hiding, and over forty years since he last set off a bomb. If I'm not allowed to offer him provisional forgiveness on that record, when am I allowed to forgive somebody? When am I allowed to let somebody's past go, and consider his more recent actions as the standard to measure him against?
And when does a person's past leach out to the point that it only taints him, and not the people who touch him?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 06:52 am (UTC)In any case, I'm still waiting for your answer to the rest of my comment.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 07:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 03:50 pm (UTC)And, more relevant to the original point, I would not feel that somebody who chose to work with him was endorsing Mr. Ayers's past. He's spent over twenty-five years building a life in the open without blowing things up, and he hasn't blown up anything in over thirty-five years (correcting my math). I think that's enough distance that if somebody chooses to work with him, there's no cause to cry, "terrorist sympathizer!"
I can't judge somebody on the worlds of if. If Ayers was just getting out on parole, would I treat him differently? Sure. But that's not what I'm dealing with, any more than I'm judging Bill Clinton on the alternate universe where he kept it in his pants, or George W. Bush on the alternate universe where we found a massive stockpile of WMDs in Iraq.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 01:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 02:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 02:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 03:04 am (UTC)Though Ayers was a bomber, he seems never to have actually attacked people.
Bombs sometimes go off when you don't want them to. That's how Ayres lost his first Weather Underground girlfriend.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 04:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 12:49 pm (UTC)And here we have the prosecutor himself on the matter
Date: 2008-10-11 01:33 am (UTC)Re: And here we have the prosecutor himself on the matter
Date: 2008-10-11 12:50 pm (UTC)You're very welcome
Date: 2008-10-12 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 11:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 12:04 am (UTC)His wife was arguably at least as bad, if not worse, infamously for her comment regarding the murder of Sharon Tate, which begins with "Groovy!" and passes on into lip-smacking glee at the thought of the double murder of a pregnant woman and her fetus with a fondue fork.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 12:40 am (UTC)There is a report that Bernardine Dohrn referred to the murder of Sharon Tate. There is no report that she ever served human flesh.
Let's try to keep perspective on this.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 12:34 am (UTC)This is your second comment.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 01:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 02:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 05:30 pm (UTC)